Charting church history

It’s amazing what a difference a few lines can make when you’re trying to chart church history. Jim West started things off today by offering the following chart as a nice representation of where various Christian groups came from:

click to embiggen

It’s got an interesting layout, and I love the fact that Willow Creek gets its own box.

Ari has taken exception to Jim’s chart and offers the following in its place:

click to embiggen

Do you see the difference? Isn’t it fascinating how a few lines can can change the way that you tell the story?

Personally, I think that Baptists should be at the top. Everyone knows they came first, but the groups that came along later were so jealous that they persecuted them into hiding until after the Reformation.

Advertisements

About Marc Cortez

Theology Prof and Dean at Western Seminary, husband, father, & blogger, who loves theology, church history, ministry, pop culture, books, and life in general.

Posted on January 17, 2011, in Church History and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. 7 Comments.

  1. Oc course Ari’s chart is correct! 🙂

  2. The Baptist trail of blood, eh, Marc? I grew up the son of a Baptist preacher man, comrade 😉 .

  3. That’s funny, Calvary Chapel got their own too. I attended their Bible College and was in the inner-hub at Calvary Chapel Costa Mesa under his Papal imminence’s watchful eye Chuck Smith (their church gvt. is actually very Episcopal, more like Roman Catholics) 😉 .

  1. Pingback: Charting church history from a baptist perspective « scientia et sapientia

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: