An irrefutable argument against evolution in 10 words

Such rigorous logic. Simply irrefutable.

HT

About Marc Cortez

Theology Prof and Dean at Western Seminary, husband, father, & blogger, who loves theology, church history, ministry, pop culture, books, and life in general.

Posted on July 10, 2010, in Creation. Bookmark the permalink. 5 Comments.

  1. Can’t combat that one. 🙂

  2. Leaving aside that the person has failed to grasp that we didn’t evolve from monkeys, but monkeys and humans evolved from a common ancestor, the person who posed the question was probably an American, which adds to the irony. Here’s why: even if evolution results in a sub-species becoming a distinct species from its parent species while the latter continues to exist, that just parallels the history of the U.S., since we could ask the parallel question “If America evolved from Britain, why is there still Britain?” 🙂

  3. There is still a Britain?! 🙂

  4. I realized after I posted this that there’s another sense in which this argument is “irrefutable,” since I’m betting that there’s nothing you could say to the person who wrote this to convince him/her that the statement is incorrect.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: