Tips for the ThM – Part 2 (strong arguments)
Many of the Th.M. research papers that I read manifest a common problem; they lack a clear, strong argument. Instead, students seem to prefer research papers that are more summative or explorative. Papers like this will sometimes explicitly declare their intent to “explore” a topic: “This paper will explore John Calvin’s view of predestination.” Others, will take a more indirect route and just start summarizing out of the gate. (Biblical Theology and history papers are particularly prone to this.) Either way, rather than staking out a position, these papers just summarize data.
There is nothing wrong with providing a good summary. Indeed, that is often critical for writing an effective paper. If you are dealing with a complex issue on which there are multiple perspectives, you need a good summary to orient yourself and your readers on the topic. But, a good summary is not enough for a quality research paper. That’s only the first step. The more significant part of the project comes when you identify the position that you will take.
That’s why writing a thesis statement for your paper is so important. The thesis statement clearly communicates what your are doing with the paper. If you have a weak thesis statement (“I will explore…” or “This paper will look at…”), you will have a weak paper. A strong thesis statement, on the other hand, makes an explicit claim that must then be supported and defended through the course of the paper. Something like, “I will argue that John Calvin’s view of predestination was more biblical and less speculative than that of later interpreters like William Perkins.” Or, “In this paper, we will see that Richard Muller’s arguments regarding the faithfulness and accuracy of Calvin’s later interpreters are correct.” If I took a little more time, I’m sure I could come up with better examples of strong thesis statements. But, you get the point. Make a claim. It doesn’t need to be a new claim, but it does need to be one that you will argue and defend in the paper.
A good Th.M. research paper, then, should clearly stake out a position, interact with the primary data/opinions that both support and contradict that position, and conclude with a statement of how all of this leads to the conclusion drawn in the paper. Don’t get cute. These are not creative writing classes. A good research paper can serve as the foundation for a more creative writing project later. For now, focus on developing a solid argument that is clearly explained and well defended.
Posted on April 5, 2010, in Th.M. Program and tagged Critical Thinking, Master of Theology, strong arguments, Th.M., thesis statements. Bookmark the permalink. 7 Comments.
I am glad you pointed this out. For crafting a strong thesis statement, one particularly helpful resource for me was Wayne C. Booth, Gregory G. Colomb, Joseph M. Williams, The Craft of Research, 3rd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008). For those who might not know, Part I of Kate Turabian’s A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations is a condensed version of Booth, Colomb, and Williams’ book.
Pingback: Tips for ThM Students « Western Seminary
Pingback: Tips for ThM Students « Near Emmaus: Christ and Text
Pingback: Tips for the ThM – Part 3 (concise arguments) « scientia et sapientia
Pingback: Tips for the ThM (summary) « scientia et sapientia
Pingback: Tips for the ThM (roundup) « scientia et sapientia
Pingback: Marc Cortez–Study Tips. | Trinitarian Dance